"How was work today?"
"Today I learned that the most expensive peanut butter sold in the United States costs six hundred dollars a pound."
Choosy moms, apparently, choose NIST SRM-2387.
« An interesting turn of events to say the least. | Main | Independence Day. »
30 June 2006
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments
- bearing on Hand in hand in hand.
- mandamum on Hand in hand in hand.
- bearing on Hand in hand in hand.
- Melanie Bettinelli on Hand in hand in hand.
- Kim N on Hand in hand in hand.
- Angela on Narrators.
- joy on Narrators.
- mandamum on Narrators.
- bearing on The importance of taking temperatures.
- Melanie B on The importance of taking temperatures.
Popular Series of Posts
- Postsecondary education questions
- Blogging my way through Introduction to the Devout Life.
- Co-schooling: Repeated, regular, and reciprocal homeschooling with other families.
- "Self-Weaning?" and "Situational Weaning: Two Examples"
- Chronological index on gluttony, weight loss, and weight maintenance.
- The series on "Induced Exercise:" Going from "sedentary" to "athlete."
I think I read something somewhere about this
Categories
- and/or shelter (5)
- at home and elsewhere (24)
- bad ideas (2)
- Bad things happen (63)
- Beautiful things (166)
- Benedict XVI (22)
- Books (155)
- Budgeting (24)
- Chronological index: Me and my weight loss (106)
- clothing (6)
- Co-schooling (67)
- Current Affairs (21)
- Education (32)
- Education, at home and elsewhere (383)
- Engineering (53)
- Faith and Doubt (239)
- Favorites (51)
- Film (4)
- Food (5)
- Food and Drink (12)
- Food, clothing, and/or shelter (276)
- Francis I (10)
- Gadgets (48)
- Games (1)
- Gluttony (161)
- Good ideas (3)
- Good ideas, bad ideas (10)
- History (92)
- Homemaking for engineers (147)
- Humor (44)
- Language (16)
- Language(s) (90)
- Law (24)
- Lent (11)
- Life in Minneapolis (123)
- Liturgy (64)
- Lower on the Food Chain (24)
- Marriage (108)
- Mary (13)
- Mathematics (27)
- Media (113)
- Music (15)
- New paradigms in homemaking (29)
- Old teaching mistaken for shocking development (5)
- On raising kids (352)
- Politics (97)
- Pop Culture (88)
- Prayer (99)
- Pregnancy and childbirth (153)
- Question for readers (34)
- Recipeblogging (185)
- Religion (17)
- Resolutions (35)
- Risks & benefits (60)
- Sacraments (44)
- Sane Mom Revolution (7)
- Science (20)
- Science (Biology) (46)
- Science (Chemistry) (17)
- Science (General) (63)
- Science (Pediatric Research) (11)
- Science (Social) (26)
- Scripture (61)
- Sloth (37)
- Small victories (44)
- Something different (200)
- Sports (117)
- State in life (110)
- Technology (30)
- Temperance (21)
- The Culture of Life (58)
- The early Christians (18)
- The last three pounds (36)
- The Omniscient "They." I. Scientists (2)
- Time (35)
- Travel (40)
- Tribe (51)
- True Confessions (23)
- Try New Things (59)
- Unintended consequences (4)
- Web/Tech (7)
- Weblogs (1)
- Weight loss (215)
- Weight maintenance (190)
- Weight Subtopic Other Writers (40)
- Weight Subtopic Personal (205)
- Weight Subtopic Recipes Menus (21)
- Weight Subtopic Tips (80)
- What's Wrong with the World (32)
- Wish I'd written that... (25)
Blogging Like It's 2005
Become a Fan
All writing and images © E. G. Arlinghaus except where noted.
The image "Prickly Pear Cactus Fruit" was published by Ken Bosma on Flickr under a Creative Commons license and accessed on May 7, 2016. It has been resized.
I really, really hope you're going to have an explanation for us at some point. What is this-- organic free-range peanuts grown by Tibetan monks who prayed over them from the day they were planted until they were picked?
Posted by: Meira Voirdire | 30 June 2006 at 09:31 AM
It's a very carefully prepared standard, used for calibrating tests of nutritional composition.
I'm unaware of whether it's able to calibrate, say, the devotion with which the Tibetan monks hired by prayed over the peanuts.
Posted by: bearing | 30 June 2006 at 01:52 PM
This makes organic PB look like a positively frugal choice.
Posted by: Jamie | 03 July 2006 at 11:52 AM