Instapundit pointed to this think-tank piece today that, I think, is worth reading:
Americans borrow roughly $126 billion a year to pay for college...This heavy debt load is causing much suffering...there is plenty of blame to spread around.
The piece discusses the government's portion (encouraging people to go into debt to start degrees they likely won't finish), the financial institutions' portion (structuring the loan system poorly) and the universities' portion (spending enormously, mostly with student debt), as well as the part that's the fault of students and their parents:
While earlier generations that paid only a few hundred dollars a semester can perhaps be forgiven for continuing to believe that college is a nearly risk-free decision financially, today's students do not have that luxury. Exploding tuition and the related horror stories about crushing debt loads appear regularly in the media. Yet students and parents largely ignore these warnings. The views that more (formal) education is almost always a good thing and that the loans needed to finance it are "good debt" since it is an investment are both widespread and contribute to the problem. While true to an extent, these views can be and are being carried too far by some, blinding some individuals to the dangers of debt.
I have been following the student-debt story with some interest, I suppose because I can feel it changing my mind.
I was graduated from high school in 1992. When I was in high school and college -- public high school, state university -- I believed that college was a risk-free decision, with a few caveats. I understood that if circumstances forced you to drop out, your money and time might be wasted; and, in my mind, you had to major in something "useful," otherwise it was your own darn fault if you couldn't get a job afterward. I also found it really hard to understand why anyone would spend so much money going to a private school when there was such a thing as a state university, but I chalked that one up to taste. So I had some pragmatism, but really, I completely bought the "thou must attend college or be a loser" line.
Hardly anyone in my peer group chose not to enroll in college the same year we graduated. A few ran into hardships that prevented their enrolling, but I would have been rather scandalized if any of my friends were to say "Sure, I could go to college, but for me and what I plan to do, it's just not worth the cost." I would have been thinking, I thought you were a contender, but I guess you're just a bum.
And hey, it wasn't too long ago that I wrote this semi-famous post (the Anchoress linked to it, and it's still one of my highest-traffic posts ever). I am not repudiating what I wrote there about whether education is "wasted" on a stay-at-home mother -- and you'll note that it contains a caveat about not going into debt -- but it is pretty clear that I come at the subject with an underlying assumption that more education is generally better.
I had the luxury of attending college and graduate school on scholarship, which undoubtedly affected my opinion. Hey, if someone offers you free money, it changes the calculation. But I find myself with different thoughts these days. We expect our kids to go on to some kind of additional training after high school, but I try to talk about it in a more open-ended way. Four years at a four-year college doesn't automatically make sense for every bright and motivated high school graduate anymore. Especially not if you would have to go into debt for it. There are other ways to be.
Maybe it's the homeschooling habit. You see all the opportunities for real self-education that are out there. You get used to thinking that a lot of the time, credentials are not much more than pieces of paper. You understand the value of your family's time, and you get used to saying "no" to some admittedly cool-sounding enrichment opportunities because they make it hard for everyone to sit down to dinner together, or because you'd have to drive across town in rush hour traffic. You want the best for your kids, and it turns out that your idea of "the best" is different from what you expected it would be.
Update: Don't take on debt to go to culinary school.
Added: I seem to be getting some feedback that assumes I'm saying that all degrees are meaningless paper, or that private college is a waste of money, or that liberal arts degrees aren't worth it, or that loans are always a bad thing. Not at all. But there seem to be a heck of a lot of people taking out loans and shelling out cash who don't understand the concept of return on investment. I think some of them don't understand the concept of "loan."
Some people may be carrying assumptions that were valid a generation ago but aren't anymore. Once, *any* college degree was a ticket to a good paying job. Guess what. Now so many people have college degrees that the value of a college degree has been diluted. Once, college was less expensive. It's more expensive now. Ergo, some prices are too high to pay for some degrees.
A lot of it depends on what you expect to get out of it. And if you are seeking higher education not because you expect it to help you earn more money (or to earn acceptable money but at a job that you might enjoy more), but just to make yourself a more well-rounded person, well, let's just say I'm not really happy about my taxes funding your defaulted loan...
Is it odd that this is one of my chief fears about homeschooling? It's probably way, way too early for me to be thinking about it, but I've already found that reading homeschooling blogs and the like has made me more of the "maybe 4 year college isn't for everyone, even including the exceptionally bright" mindset.
And my husband isn't there yet. I mean, we both agree that maybe college isn't or shouldn't be necessary if a high school degree actually reflected the competencies that it used to, or is supposed to, or something. But that's not the state of the world, so even jobs that could be done well with a high school diploma are all looking for college graduates. I guess the question is, what do you do in that situation?
Posted by: Kathy | 21 September 2010 at 09:02 AM
Like I said, I'm not saying stop learning after high school. I'm saying that the attitude of "four years at a four year college automatically is the best choice" is not reasonable.
For a lot of people, it still is a viable
Posted by: bearing | 21 September 2010 at 09:40 AM
... choice (sorry), but that's not automatic. Can you pay for it without going into debt? If you do go into debt, do you really have prospects good enough to pay the debt promptly? Do you know what you're going to major in and how it's going to serve you?
Transfer colleges exist. Vocational training exists. Internships and apprenticeships exist. There is the military. There are public-service-for-education agreements. High school isn't enough for many jobs, but it hardly makes sense to go into debt on the assumption that it surely will pay. And I haven't started ranting yet about why any rational person would go into debt to attend a private school and major in something that will not produce a return sufficient to offset the debt.
Posted by: bearing | 21 September 2010 at 09:46 AM
I graduated from a private Catholic liberal arts college and my eldest is now attending the same college. I don't consider my time at that college wasted AT ALL. It was worth every penny. I think the main problem is that most colleges have become glorified trade schools. College education should be about educating the whole person, not about getting one ready for a job. Higher education should be about forming the intellect, imparting the skills necessary to discern and embrace truth.
The debt load from my college was not crushing as the college is very generous with financial aid and works hard to make sure no one graduates with large debt. The "Newman Guide to Choosing a Catholic College" is something that every Catholic parent should read before making the college decision.
As regards needing a college education to homeschool - I don't think it is a necessity, but I have seen in the different homeschooling groups I have been in that the women without higher education are less confident about their ability to homeschool and choose educational materials for their children. My husband and I have at different times held classes for homeschoolers. The students who are faithful and stick out the course are the ones from college families; the others are often inconsistent about attendence, don't take the class seriously or drop out before the end. I also noticed that children whose parent/s were educated in another country value education more than their US counterparts. I want to make it clear that I'm not being a snob or belittling anyone without a college education. I am just stating my observations during my 17 years of homeschooling. What the causes are is up for debate.
Posted by: Kate | 21 September 2010 at 11:26 AM
I have two different degrees. My first degree was a BA in Slavic Languages and Literatures from Berkeley. I transferred from a community college about halfway through and spent a year abroad, in all it took me 6 years. My mom paid for it with her inheritance. It was a must from her side of the family that all children receive higher education.
My second degree is a professional (contra academic) bachelor in nursing from a nursing school in Copenhagen. It took me 3,5 years and was paid for by Danish taxpayers, who also gave me financial aid for the duration. I now work full time as a nurse and I love it. There are advantages and disadvantages to the nursing education here; it is much less science-based than in the US and much more philosophical (the feeling being that you learn the practical aspects of nursing during your practicum).
Ironically, the nursing school taught me much more about philosophy, critical thinking, ethics, etc, etc, than my more generic "liberal" degree from Cal, which was glorified high school. And now I consider nursing, if not a vocation on par with marriage, a charism at least.
I don't *really* consider the first BA a total waste (even though my Russian is now extremely rusty), even though at this point what I got out of it was a husband, whom I met while in St. Petersburg. But it's pretty darn close.
So my vote is higher education with a huge grain of salt, and vocational choices do not necessarily exclude enrichment as a human being.
Posted by: Rebekka | 21 September 2010 at 12:21 PM
The grain of salt is what I think is missing from a lot of these discussions -- people write and talk about it as if it simply *must* be worth it to get an advanced degree at almost any cost. This assumption needs examination.
Posted by: bearing | 21 September 2010 at 12:53 PM
I would have no qualms about my kids not going to college IF they had a viable alternative plan other than a very vague "I'm just going to get a job". I don't think that is a concept I would have arrived at if I hadn't started homeschooling.
I went away to college on scholarship, so I felt less guilty about not choosing a career-oriented major. To me it was about life learning and experiencing a wider variety of people and opportunities. Once I graduated, though, I realized that a college degree just gets your foot in the door and more bargaining power over pay. Experience mattered way more than education.
Homeschoolers, in general, probably have more time to explore their career options and gain real world experience. And their parents are probably more likely to offer guidance instead of expecting the school's counselor to do so. This puts the necessity of college in question.
Whereas a lot schooled kids are so caught up in the school machinery that college is made out to be the automatic next step even though they have no clear career goals or the critical thinking skills to make the most of a non-career oriented college path. (Speaking from experience.)
I've really been trying hard to work with my kids on discerning their vocation(s) (what God wants them to be) rather than their future career. And then we'll see how college fits into that.
Since my husband teaches at a community college where we get an employee discount, I suspect that most of our kids will attend there at some point.
Posted by: Barbara C. | 21 September 2010 at 02:28 PM
What a timely post! This morning my local newspaper's headline read: Goal for Texas: 3 million more college degrees. The premise of the article is that you must have a degree to have "access to the middle class". I didn't feel the article covered the whole story behind college degrees for many of the reasons you mention. I have great issues with excessive college debt and the rising cost of a college degree (and the diminishing returns one receives!).
Posted by: Kristin | 21 September 2010 at 03:13 PM
Wow, great post, lots of comments.
I went into the army at 17, 3 weeks after high school. I did my 4 years, had a great learning experience, and then used the money to pay for some college. I did not finish: Unplanned, unwed, pregnancy. I have enough credit for a bachelors, but not from one school. So I am taking online courses to finish up. It is hard, but a personal challenge sort of thing. Plus, and this may sound wacky, but I just want to have something in case anything should happen to my husband. In reality, I think I could earn more than him after my graduation. Should I then head into the workforce? That is for another discussion. :)
My oldest, my unplanned, is a sophomore. We have thought about college a lot. One interesting factor for us: most of our friends are very fundamentalist protestants -- they really do not support the idea of girls attending university. When we finally met some catholic teen girls and they just assume they are heading off, she started thinking about it and wants to attend Christendom. But one thing that I think many people should consider: dual enrollment and CLEP tests. I plan on her doing the CLEP tests for sure, perhaps some dual enrollment if she can attend with a friend, and also online like I am doing. Those are methods to lessen the costs. I have not looked into small colleges accepting transfers, but I am hopeful. We just cannot afford to pay for her college (6 kids, we homeschool) and I would hate to see her graduate with a ton of debt.
Posted by: Delores | 21 September 2010 at 04:57 PM
A Newsweek article about the "useless" liberal arts degree:
http://education.newsweek.com/2010/09/12/college-making-the-case-for-useless-degrees.html
Posted by: Kate | 21 September 2010 at 04:58 PM
Delores, don't write off private Catholic schools, just assuming you can't afford it. We have a large family and our two eldest are going to Thomas Aquinas College and Wyoming Catholic College. These colleges have been very generous with financial aid. They both have a policy that if a student is accepted, they will find the money to help you attend. Really, folks are often surprised that our kids are going to private colleges - we drive clunkers, shop at thrift stores and live on a free-lance writer's income. Pray that God show his will for your children's future and many surprising doors will open.
Posted by: Kate | 21 September 2010 at 07:41 PM
Hmmm.
First off, I grew up in a family headed by a wonderful man who worked most of my life for a state community/vocational college. I had a free ride at any state school because of it. Both my sister and I chose ridiculously expensive private colleges (both in Minnesota, ha), financed with scholarships (mostly) and student loans (still a nice chunk). I paid off my student loans within 3.5 years of graduation, and despite eating beans and rice those three years, I still say my education was worth every penny. I work at a state school now, and while I think my institution offers a quality education, I am so glad I went into debt for my education. (And glad it is paid off, ha.)
I was struck that you said that most of your contemporaries went to college. Growing up in a very poor area of rural MN, that was definitely NOT the case for my friends and classmates. I still remember my second semester at my elite private school, listening to people who had never watched their parents "skip" dinner because there was no food talking about how degrees were meaningless pieces of paper, and education should matter for the sake of education...and I felt like throwing up. Because that piece of paper that they were devaluing was my ticket to a different way of life- more security than my parents ever dreamed of, better work/pay/etc.
ALthough I hear your argument- and agree with you that the cost of education is ridiculous and means that serious thought is warranted (college is NOT for everyone!)...I just can't help but think of my father, a hardworking, caring, dedicated man who has worked at the same place for 23 years- and who makes less than if they hired a college grad with no experience to take his job, because he lacks a degree.
Sorry that turned into a book!
Posted by: Nomad | 21 September 2010 at 08:38 PM
Nomad,
If you were able to pay your loans off in just a few years, it means that you must not have gone into a reasonable amount of debt relative to your earning potential. That's not the situation I'm talking about.
Many degrees are not meaningless pieces of paper. But a lot of them ARE. Some discretion is necessary to decide whether to go into debt for it!
Posted by: bearing | 22 September 2010 at 08:01 AM
I think it's a great time to not go to college. For kids with an entrepreneural bent, I'm not sure there's ever been a time with more opportunities than today. But for the college bound, here's how to get a degree from an accredited institution for $15,000 total: http://www.garynorth.com/products/item7.cfm
(it's a link to paid material, but a lot of the info can be found through google and YouTube. I have no affiliation or financial interest)
Posted by: Greg | 22 September 2010 at 12:28 PM