Alice Bradley of Finslippy
lists the 75 things she learned from her mother.
« Science "curricula." | Main | Snap Circuits-based electricity unit. »
20 November 2011
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Recent Comments
- bearing on Hand in hand in hand.
- mandamum on Hand in hand in hand.
- bearing on Hand in hand in hand.
- Melanie Bettinelli on Hand in hand in hand.
- Kim N on Hand in hand in hand.
- Angela on Narrators.
- joy on Narrators.
- mandamum on Narrators.
- bearing on The importance of taking temperatures.
- Melanie B on The importance of taking temperatures.
Popular Series of Posts
- Postsecondary education questions
- Blogging my way through Introduction to the Devout Life.
- Co-schooling: Repeated, regular, and reciprocal homeschooling with other families.
- "Self-Weaning?" and "Situational Weaning: Two Examples"
- Chronological index on gluttony, weight loss, and weight maintenance.
- The series on "Induced Exercise:" Going from "sedentary" to "athlete."
I think I read something somewhere about this
Categories
- and/or shelter (5)
- at home and elsewhere (24)
- bad ideas (2)
- Bad things happen (63)
- Beautiful things (166)
- Benedict XVI (22)
- Books (155)
- Budgeting (24)
- Chronological index: Me and my weight loss (106)
- clothing (6)
- Co-schooling (67)
- Current Affairs (21)
- Education (32)
- Education, at home and elsewhere (383)
- Engineering (53)
- Faith and Doubt (239)
- Favorites (51)
- Film (4)
- Food (5)
- Food and Drink (12)
- Food, clothing, and/or shelter (276)
- Francis I (10)
- Gadgets (48)
- Games (1)
- Gluttony (161)
- Good ideas (3)
- Good ideas, bad ideas (10)
- History (92)
- Homemaking for engineers (147)
- Humor (44)
- Language (16)
- Language(s) (90)
- Law (24)
- Lent (11)
- Life in Minneapolis (123)
- Liturgy (64)
- Lower on the Food Chain (24)
- Marriage (108)
- Mary (13)
- Mathematics (27)
- Media (113)
- Music (15)
- New paradigms in homemaking (29)
- Old teaching mistaken for shocking development (5)
- On raising kids (352)
- Politics (97)
- Pop Culture (88)
- Prayer (99)
- Pregnancy and childbirth (153)
- Question for readers (34)
- Recipeblogging (185)
- Religion (17)
- Resolutions (35)
- Risks & benefits (60)
- Sacraments (44)
- Sane Mom Revolution (7)
- Science (20)
- Science (Biology) (46)
- Science (Chemistry) (17)
- Science (General) (63)
- Science (Pediatric Research) (11)
- Science (Social) (26)
- Scripture (61)
- Sloth (37)
- Small victories (44)
- Something different (200)
- Sports (117)
- State in life (110)
- Technology (30)
- Temperance (21)
- The Culture of Life (58)
- The early Christians (18)
- The last three pounds (36)
- The Omniscient "They." I. Scientists (2)
- Time (35)
- Travel (40)
- Tribe (51)
- True Confessions (23)
- Try New Things (59)
- Unintended consequences (4)
- Web/Tech (7)
- Weblogs (1)
- Weight loss (215)
- Weight maintenance (190)
- Weight Subtopic Other Writers (40)
- Weight Subtopic Personal (205)
- Weight Subtopic Recipes Menus (21)
- Weight Subtopic Tips (80)
- What's Wrong with the World (32)
- Wish I'd written that... (25)
Blogging Like It's 2005
Become a Fan
All writing and images © E. G. Arlinghaus except where noted.
The image "Prickly Pear Cactus Fruit" was published by Ken Bosma on Flickr under a Creative Commons license and accessed on May 7, 2016. It has been resized.
Regarding your comment on the Bohr model, it's worth noting that the Bohr model makes exact predictions for the spectral lines of Hydrogen. It has its failings, but also its successes. It is by no means a complete model, but it is far more intuitive than the full solutions to schroedinger's (or heisenberg's) equation for the population density of an electron.
(I posted this on the wrong post first. Sorry.)
Posted by: Chris | 22 November 2011 at 02:50 PM
Apparently you posted this on the wrong post second, too. ;)
Are you sure you are an expert?
Posted by: bearing | 23 November 2011 at 08:40 AM