This is part of a read-along hosted by myself and MrsDarwin of DarwinCatholic.
The main page is here.
MrsDarwin's biographical sketch of the author, Robert Hugh Benson, is here.
My introductory post is here.
+ + +
And now we come to the last of the Seven Last Words from the Cross. Benson takes “Father, into your hands I commend my Spirit” as a reflection upon the concept of the peace of Christ. For the death of Christ is one picture of the Peace of Christ: something to remember, when we at Mass hear the words “The peace of Christ be with you”; something to remember when, at every Mass, it comes time to sing Dona nobis pacem. “Dona nobis mortem tuum” has not the same ring, and would be an incomplete notion of that Peace, but it is surely part thereof.
In the meditation upon peace, Benson pauses to warn us against Quietism, a class of heresy that I had to look up to be sure of. Do read up on it yourself; I will summarize it as a sort of extreme end of a spectrum, one with a boundary that is to my eyes blurry: where Abandonment to Divine Providence slips into a denial of agency whatsoever, where contemplation and striving for interior holiness precludes the possibility of good and holy acts.
On the contrary! Interior peace, says Benson, is a prerequisite to the accomplishment of the objects of good acts; the attainment of interior peace is a signal that we are empowered to do good, not a signal that to do good is no longer required of us.
I believe what he has to say, but I think there must be more to it: for I experience this message as somewhat paralyzing. I do not possess interior peace, certainly not permanently; maybe just “not yet”; maybe I achieve it intermittently at best. Anyway, whatever piece of the Peace of Christ I come to is imperfect and fleeting. Does that mean that my activities are pointless, fruitless? Ought I suspend activity (beyond what I’m clearly required to do as responses to my state of life) and concentrate my efforts on interior reform, or maybe wait and pray until I find myself transformed? Or is there sort of a oscillation, a learning from experience, regret and repentance giving way to renewal?
I can’t count the times I have overstepped my competence, gotten ahead of my skis, and face-planted, trying to “do” Christianity. Drawing back from that, contemplating more, competence/competing less, is the correction I have sought for the last few years. And so I am grateful for Benson’s caution against Quietism, because I can easily see myself overcorrecting. What I call retreating to seek Christ’s peace within might easily slide into avoidant behavior: fear of conflict, of discomfort, of making mistakes. Still, not every conflict is specifically mine to take up. We have to discern.
+ + +
Besides the death of Christ itself, the Peace of Christ is (says Benson) “a Peace... which, unlike other satisfying emotions, is wholly independent of external things.”
This immediately put me in mind of the Beatitude: “Blessed are the meek” (in most English translations), “for they shall inherit the Earth.” Here I have to apologize a bit in advance, for this is my favorite rant about Scripture translating: I contend that English “meek” needs updating. I am insufficiently expert to know exactly what’s the correct term, but the word in Bibles of other modern European languages connote not quite so much a submission or submerging of the self, but a serene sailing, Benson’s “bird poised in the air”: unruffled-ness, undisturbable, a “perfect response” to the currents and eddies that arrive. Perhaps “mild” is a good updated English word, something with connotations of pleasant weather and of unbitter fruit. Now, when I read the Beatitudes, having once come to that bit in the Louis Segond: “Heureux les débonnaires” (literally de bon air, a weather metaphor), the image that leaps to mind is the storm-panicked disciples, and Christ stilling the waves.
The Peace of Christ is something undisturbable from the outside. And yet, if the Peace of Christ is also in a sense the death of Christ, then it was the outside world that visited it upon Him. Unless the death of Christ, the death we die with Him, the death of self, is exactly that serenity, the one that says always “The Lord giveth, the Lord taketh: blessed be the Lord.”
+ + +
The Seven Last Words are words which cost the Lord dearly; He had only so many breaths before exhaustion. Each breath (according to our understanding of the physiology of crucifixion) required effort to generate an audible utterance, generated more suffering than silence; each word a part of the perfection of His Atonement. They are, I believe, an exemplar of poetry rather than prose: every word counts, not a word is there that was not intended, nothing is omitted without reason. They are his last chances as recognizable Man to shape our understanding of Himself and what He has done for us, and yet they are so brief, so clipped, so rare, so dear.
I think it is interesting to reflect upon each of the Seven Last Words and consider how our understanding of Christ and his Passion would be changed should he have left any of them out.
Take “It is finished,” which Cat has meditated upon here. Where would we be without that assurance? What doctrine might we have developed without it, where might the Church have wandered? And yet He left us in some ambiguity: Consummatum est without an explicit subject. We have had to make something of “it,” to use out collective judgment, even to debate and dispute it, apparently in accord with His penultimate earthly will.
But I am here to reflect upon “Father, into your hands I commend my spirit.” I could meditate on why He spoke this instead of nothing. Instead I find myself thinking about something that—though it seems true—something he might have said, but chose not to say: Friends, into your hands I commend my body.
He did not say this to them, and yet, the friends did receive His body, and cared for it the way they knew, with the resources they had. Benson: “this Body of His is to be laid in the cool rock tomb, with wrappings of soft linen, soaked in spices and myrrh...” It was His Friends who did this for him, unasked, uncommanded.
How difficult it is for us to notice when we have assumed something! I have always assumed without thinking that it was His explicit will that His body be cared for, wrapped and perfumed and buried, by His friends: that there be a tomb, that there be a stone. The Resurrection perhaps we can take for granted. The empty tomb itself is often identified with it. And yet He seems not to have ordered it, not explicitly, certainly not here. The friends perhaps had to figure out what to do with the Body of Christ without an instruction from Him.
Having heard His last Word, they could trust that His Spirit had been commended to the Father. Did they know what to do next—Nicodemus, Joseph, Mary Magdalene, John, the others? Did they have interior peace about it? They were left with the Body yet unclaimed and nothing but its physical nature, no command but that of Time: Time which, after the darkening of the sun and the rending of the veil, somehow kept rolling forward, bringing the fall of evening, the chilling of the flesh, the approach of that singular, terrifying Sabbath, that other peace of God that “passeth all understanding.”
Time, the Law, and Friendship. They claimed His Body and loved it, and God took care of the rest.
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.